flowchart LR
T[Teacher<br/>Subject mastery,<br/>method, personality] --- C[Content<br/>Curriculum,<br/>experiences]
C --- L[Learner<br/>Readiness, motivation,<br/>prior knowledge]
L --- T
T -. Communication .-> L
L -. Feedback .-> T
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
2 Teaching: Concept, Objectives, Levels of teaching (Memory, Understanding and Reflective), Characteristics and basic requirements
2.1 Concept of Teaching
Teaching is a purposive, interactive, tripolar activity in which a teacher arranges experiences so that a learner moves from a present state of knowledge or skill to a desired one. It is at once a science (drawing on educational psychology, evaluation, pedagogy) and an art (the same lesson plan in two hands produces two different classrooms).
The Sanskrit etymology — Shiksha (instruction) and Vidya (knowledge) — and the Latin etymology — educare (to bring up) and educere (to draw out) — both reinforce a dual nature: education gives and education draws out.
2.1.1 Influential Definitions
| Educator | Definition | Foregrounds |
|---|---|---|
| H.C. Morrison | “Intimate contact between a more mature personality and a less mature one which is designed to further the education of the latter” | Relationship, maturation |
| B.O. Smith | “A system of actions intended to produce learning” | Goal-directed system |
| N.L. Gage (1963) | “Any interpersonal influence aimed at changing the ways in which other persons can or will behave” | Behavioural change |
| Edmund Amidon | “An interactive process, primarily involving classroom talk” | Interaction, talk |
| Ryburn | “A relationship that helps the child to develop his powers” | Developmental |
| John Dewey | Teaching is comparable to selling — “no one can sell unless someone else buys” | Reciprocity |
| B.F. Skinner | “The arrangement of contingencies of reinforcement under which students learn” | Reinforcement |
2.1.2 Nature of Teaching
- Purposive — driven by objectives, not happenstance.
- Interactive / Tripolar — three poles (teacher, learner, content).
- Dynamic — same content delivered differently to different cohorts.
- Social — shaped by family, school, society.
- Both science and art — empirical and creative.
- Formal or informal — classroom or community.
- Value-laden — every act transmits values.
- Evaluable — every act can be assessed against objectives.
2.1.3 Aim, Goal, Objective — the Hierarchy
| Level | Scope | Time-frame | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aim | Broad, philosophical | Long-term | “Develop responsible citizens” |
| Goal | Programme/course-level | Medium-term | “Introduce undergraduates to economic reasoning” |
| Objective | Specific, measurable, behavioural | Single lesson | “Compute price elasticity of demand from a dataset” |
2.2 Objectives of Teaching
A teaching objective is a statement of what the learner should be able to do at the end of the lesson. The standard framework is Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956), revised by Anderson and Krathwohl (2001).
2.2.1 Bloom’s Original Taxonomy (1956) — Three Domains
| Domain | Concerned with | Levels (low → high) |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive | Knowing and thinking | Knowledge → Comprehension → Application → Analysis → Synthesis → Evaluation |
| Affective | Feeling, valuing, attitude | Receiving → Responding → Valuing → Organising → Characterising |
| Psychomotor | Doing, skill, coordination | Imitation → Manipulation → Precision → Articulation → Naturalisation |
2.2.2 Anderson & Krathwohl Revised Taxonomy (2001)
The 2001 revision renames every level as a verb and flips the top two rungs — Synthesis is renamed Create and moved to the top; Evaluation becomes Evaluate and drops one rung.
flowchart BT
K[Remember<br/>Recall facts] --> U[Understand<br/>Explain ideas]
U --> A[Apply<br/>Use in new situations]
A --> N[Analyse<br/>Break into parts]
N --> E[Evaluate<br/>Justify a stand]
E --> C[Create<br/>Produce new work]
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
- Original (1956): … Analysis → Synthesis → Evaluation
- Revised (2001): … Analyse → Evaluate → Create
The revision also adds a Knowledge Dimension (Factual, Conceptual, Procedural, Metacognitive) — creating a two-dimensional grid.
2.2.3 Behavioural Objectives — R.F. Mager (1962)
R.F. Mager’s Preparing Instructional Objectives (1962) sets the standard for measurable lesson objectives. Mager identifies three elements:
- Behaviour / Performance — what the learner will do (observable verb).
- Condition — circumstances under which performance occurs.
- Criterion / Standard — the level of acceptable performance.
A widely-taught extension is the A-B-C-D format — Audience, Behaviour, Condition, Degree.
Example. “Given a passage of 200 words [Condition], the learner [Audience] will identify the main idea [Behaviour] with 80 per cent accuracy [Degree].”
A common distractor offers an aim disguised as an objective. “To develop scientific temper” is too broad to measure in a single lesson; “to state Newton’s three laws of motion in own words” is measurable in forty minutes. The verb decides.
2.3 Modes of Teaching
The official syllabus distinguishes five closely-related activities. Each has a distinct goal and learner role — examiners frequently test which mode a given anecdote belongs to.
| Mode | Primary aim | Learner activity | Identifying cue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching | All-round behaviour change; understanding | Active enquiry, questioning | “Develops critical thinking” |
| Training | Specific skill or task mastery | Repetition, practice | “Job-specific” or “vocational” |
| Instruction | Knowledge acquisition / information transmission | Structured listening | “Step-by-step direction” |
| Conditioning | Habit formation through stimulus-response | Reflex-level response | “Automatic response” (Pavlov, Skinner) |
| Indoctrination | Acceptance of a doctrine/belief without questioning | Passive acceptance | “Uncritical acceptance” |
Worked example. A driving school’s training teaches the learner to operate the clutch; the instruction component delivers traffic-rule information; teaching additionally develops the judgment of when to overtake safely; conditioning the learner to stop at red lights via repeated practice creates an automatic response; indoctrination — telling the learner that “your road etiquette must follow this single ideology” — discourages questioning.
2.4 Characteristics of Teaching
- A system of actions — not random, but a planned, structured set of activities.
- A professional activity — requires specialised training, ethics, and standards.
- Interactive and communicative — built on two-way teacher-learner exchange.
- Subject to analysis and assessment — observable, measurable, improvable.
- A specialised task — requires subject mastery + pedagogical skill.
- A collection of various modes — uses teaching, training, instruction, conditioning, occasionally indoctrination, in the right proportions.
Good teaching is additionally purposeful, dynamic, social, value-laden, evaluable, and learner-centred.
2.5 Levels of Teaching
Teaching can be delivered at three increasingly demanding levels. Each level has a different cognitive target and a different main proponent. The proponent-level match is one of the most repeated PYQ patterns in this topic.
| Level | Main proponent | Cognitive target | Bloom level | Teacher’s role |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory (Thoughtless) | Herbart | Recall, recognition | Remember, Understand | Drills, repeats |
| Understanding (Thoughtful) | Morrison (definition by Bigge) | Sees relationships, applies | Apply, Analyse | Explains, illustrates |
| Reflective (Upper Thoughtful / Introspective) | Hunt (also Bigge & Hunt) | Analyses, evaluates, creates | Evaluate, Create | Poses problems, mediates inquiry |
flowchart TB
M[Memory Level<br/>Herbart<br/>Bloom: Remember, Understand] --> U[Understanding Level<br/>Morrison<br/>Bloom: Apply, Analyse]
U --> R[Reflective Level<br/>Hunt / Bigge & Hunt<br/>Bloom: Evaluate, Create]
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
2.5.1 Memory Level (Thoughtless) — Herbart
J.F. Herbart (1776–1841) propounded the Memory Level of Teaching (MLT), sometimes called the Herbartian Model or Thoughtless Teaching. It rests on his Theory of Apperception — new ideas are understood only when assimilated into the mass of ideas already in the learner’s mind. Memory teaching builds that mass.
| Step | What the teacher does |
|---|---|
| 1. Preparation | Arouse interest; connect to prior knowledge |
| 2. Presentation | Introduce new material clearly |
| 3. Association / Comparison | Link new material to old |
| 4. Generalisation | Form rules and principles |
| 5. Application | Use the rule in a new situation |
Mnemonic. “P-P-A-G-A” — Preparation, Presentation, Association, Generalisation, Application. (Some Indian texts add a sixth step, Recapitulation — NTA accepts both five-step and six-step.)
Merits. Useful for foundational facts, drill, rote-essential subjects (vocabulary, formulae).
Demerits. Encourages cramming; little role for higher-order thinking.
2.5.2 Understanding Level (Thoughtful) — Morrison
H.C. Morrison (1871–1945) propounded the Understanding Level of Teaching (ULT), sometimes called Thoughtful Teaching or Morrison’s Unit Plan. The most-quoted definition of ULT, however, comes from Morris L. Bigge (Learning Theory for Teachers, 1964) — examiners exploit this Morrison-versus-Bigge attribution distinction:
- If the stem says “main proponent”, “model”, or “Unit Plan” → Morrison.
- If the stem says “defined understanding-level teaching in Learning Theory for Teachers” → Bigge.
| Step | What the teacher does |
|---|---|
| 1. Exploration | Diagnose what learner already knows |
| 2. Presentation | Outline the unit; raise interest |
| 3. Assimilation | Deepen understanding; learner studies; teacher guides |
| 4. Organisation | Learner organises ideas; writes/reproduces without help |
| 5. Recitation | Learner orally presents what is mastered |
Mnemonic: E-P-A-O-R. Memorise this exact order — examiners shuffle the five steps and ask for the correct sequence (verified PYQs in 2020 and 2023 cycles).
Outcome. Morrison’s stated outcome is Mastery — the learner can use the concept in fresh contexts.
2.5.3 Reflective Level (Upper Thoughtful / Introspective) — Hunt
Hunt propounded the Reflective Level of Teaching (RLT). Many B.Ed. textbooks cite the joint formulation Bigge & Hunt. For NTA answer keys, treat Hunt as the single proponent of RLT.
- Problem-centred — starts from a real problem the learner perceives.
- Inquiry-led — the learner investigates, gathers evidence, decides.
- Objectives — develop insight, critical thinking, independent decision-making.
- Teacher’s role — facilitator, devil’s advocate, source of resources.
- Method — project work, problem-solving, debate, case study.
- Bloom level — Evaluate, Create.
The reflective level is what NEP-2020 implicitly endorses when it speaks of “critical thinking” and “creative problem-solving” as goals of higher education.
2.5.4 Three Levels Compared
| Dimension | Memory | Understanding | Reflective |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proponent | Herbart | Morrison (defn. Bigge) | Hunt (also Bigge & Hunt) |
| Cognitive load | Cognitive only | Cognitive + Affective | Cognitive + Affective + Conative |
| Learner state | Passive | Semi-active | Active investigator |
| Method | Drill, lecture | Discussion, demonstration | Problem-solving, project |
| Outcome | Reproduction | Mastery | Insight, decision |
| Bloom level | Remember, Understand | Apply, Analyse | Evaluate, Create |
Examples by level.
- Memory. Reciting the periodic table.
- Understanding. Explaining why metals conduct electricity.
- Reflective. Designing an experiment to test whether an unknown sample is a metal.
2.6 Phases of Teaching — Philip W. Jackson (1962)
Philip W. Jackson (Life in Classrooms, 1968) articulated three phases through which every teaching act moves.
| Phase | When | Core activities | PYQ cue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-active | Before class | Setting objectives, content selection, lesson planning, choosing strategies and aids | “Planning” / “deciding strategies” |
| Interactive | During class | Presentation of content, questioning, probing, classroom management, feedback | “Face-to-face” / “delivery” |
| Post-active | After class | Evaluation, reflection, revision of plan, remedial action | “Evaluation” / “reflection” |
flowchart LR
P[Pre-active Phase<br/>Plan and prepare] --> I[Interactive Phase<br/>Teach and engage]
I --> O[Post-active Phase<br/>Evaluate and reflect]
O -. Feedback loop .-> P
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
The feedback arrow makes teaching a discipline rather than a one-shot performance: the post-active phase feeds the next pre-active phase.
2.7 Maxims of Teaching
Maxims are practical rules for sequencing content within a lesson. They reflect psychological and logical progression. NTA stems often ask the candidate to match an anecdote to the right maxim.
| Maxim | Meaning | Classroom illustration |
|---|---|---|
| Known to Unknown | Anchor the new in the familiar | Teach Hindi alphabet by linking to mother-tongue sounds |
| Simple to Complex | Sequence by difficulty | Algebra with one variable before two |
| Concrete to Abstract | Objects first, then ideas | Use coins before introducing the “+” symbol |
| Particular to General | Build laws from instances | Several falling-object demos before the gravitational law |
| Analysis to Synthesis | Break down before building up | Dissect, then reconstruct an essay |
| Empirical to Rational | Observation before reason | Measure boiling water before introducing heat theory |
| Induction to Deduction | From examples to rules, then rules back to cases | Newton’s apples → law of gravitation → predict a satellite orbit |
| Whole to Part | Big picture first | Body diagram before organ details |
| Psychological to Logical | Learner readiness before subject logic | A sequence the learner finds approachable, even if out of textbook order |
| Definite to Indefinite | Settled facts first, then open questions | Newtonian mechanics before relativistic corrections |
| Actual to Representative | Real object before its picture | Show a cow, then a photograph of a cow |
| Near to Far | Local context first | Local geography before continents |
2.8 Principles of Teaching
| Principle | What it requires |
|---|---|
| Principle of motivation | Begin by arousing interest; sustain through relevance and reward |
| Principle of activity | Learning by doing; learners must act on content |
| Principle of interest | Connect content to learner’s curiosity and prior interest |
| Principle of individual differences | Differentiate; not all learners are alike |
| Principle of definite aim | State the lesson objective clearly at the start |
| Principle of linking with life | Show real-world application |
| Principle of feedback | Provide timely correction and reinforcement |
| Principle of democratic dealing | Learner participation, respect, freedom of expression |
Other commonly listed principles include planning, recreation, review, division (chunking), and selection.
2.9 Models of Teaching
A model of teaching is a plan or pattern that can be used to shape curriculum, design instruction, and guide classroom interaction.
2.9.1 Glaser’s Basic Teaching Model (1962)
Robert Glaser’s 1962 model is the simplest scaffold to remember — four components, with a feedback loop.
| Component | What it covers |
|---|---|
| 1. Instructional Objectives | What learner should be able to do at the end |
| 2. Entering Behaviour | Diagnostic of what learner already knows/can do |
| 3. Instructional Procedures | Methods, materials, activities |
| 4. Performance Assessment | Tests/observations to gauge whether objectives are met → feedback loop back to objectives |
Feedback is a loop, not a 5th component. Some sources mis-state Glaser’s model as having 5 components.
2.9.2 Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System (FIACS, 1955–60)
Developed by N.A. Flanders at the University of Minnesota (1955–60), FIACS is the most-cited system for observing classroom verbal interaction. It has 10 categories divided into three buckets:
| Bucket | Count | Categories |
|---|---|---|
| Teacher talk — Indirect influence | 4 | (1) Accepts feeling; (2) Praises or encourages; (3) Accepts or uses ideas of pupils; (4) Asks questions |
| Teacher talk — Direct influence | 3 | (5) Lecturing; (6) Giving directions; (7) Criticising or justifying authority |
| Student talk | 2 | (8) Response (in answer to teacher); (9) Initiation (student-initiated) |
| Silence / confusion | 1 | (10) Silence or confusion |
A common derived metric is the i/d ratio — the ratio of indirect to direct teacher influence. A higher i/d ratio is associated with greater student initiation.
2.9.3 Family of Models — Joyce & Weil
Bruce Joyce and Marsha Weil (Models of Teaching, 1972) grouped models into four families:
| Family | Aim | Example models |
|---|---|---|
| Information-processing | Mastery of concepts and information | Concept attainment, Inductive thinking, Advance organiser, Inquiry training |
| Social | Social relationships, cooperation | Group investigation, Role play, Jurisprudential inquiry |
| Personal | Self-development, self-direction | Non-directive teaching, Awareness training |
| Behavioural | Behaviour change through reinforcement | Mastery learning, Direct instruction, Self-control |
2.10 Basic Requirements of Teaching
Effective teaching rests on a small set of preconditions explicitly listed in the syllabus.
2.10.1 Three Variables of Teaching
| Variable | Description |
|---|---|
| Independent variable | The teacher — the cause/source of teaching action |
| Dependent variable | The student — whose behaviour change is the outcome |
| Intervening variable | The content, method, environment, and aids — that mediate between teacher and learner |
2.10.2 Other Basic Requirements
- Professionalism — qualified, ethical, trained teachers.
- Suitable learning environment — physical (light, sound, seating), psychological (safety, trust), social (inclusion).
- Teacher-learner relationship — respect, empathy, communication.
- Discipline and devotion — both in teacher and in learner.
- Curriculum and teaching aids — appropriate content and resources.
- Adequate institutional support — leadership, policy, infrastructure.
2.11 Practice Questions
"Teaching is a system of actions intended to produce learning." This definition is given by:
View solution
Arrange in order from broadest to most specific:
View solution
In Anderson & Krathwohl's revised Bloom's Taxonomy (2001), the levels in order from lowest to highest are:
View solution
The original Bloom's Taxonomy (1956) had its top two cognitive levels as:
View solution
The "behavioural objective" approach to instructional design — Behaviour + Condition + Criterion — is associated with:
View solution
An activity whose primary aim is "acceptance of a doctrine without questioning" is called:
View solution
Match each mode with its primary aim:
| (i) | Teaching | (a) | Skill mastery through repetition |
| (ii) | Training | (b) | Habit formation via stimulus-response |
| (iii) | Conditioning | (c) | All-round behaviour change |
| (iv) | Instruction | (d) | Knowledge transmission |
View solution
Which of the following is not a characteristic of teaching?
View solution
Match the level of teaching with its main proponent:
| (i) | Memory level | (a) | Hunt |
| (ii) | Understanding level | (b) | Herbart |
| (iii) | Reflective level | (c) | Morrison |
View solution
The Herbartian Model of teaching is also known as:
View solution
Arrange Herbart's five steps in the correct order:
(i) Generalisation
(ii) Preparation
(iii) Application
(iv) Association
(v) Presentation
View solution
Arrange Morrison's five steps of Understanding-level teaching in the correct order:
(i) Recitation
(ii) Organisation
(iii) Exploration
(iv) Presentation
(v) Assimilation
View solution
The main objective of reflective-level teaching is to develop:
View solution
In Philip W. Jackson's classification, which phase includes lesson planning, content selection and choice of teaching strategy?
View solution
The main operation during the interactive phase of teaching is:
View solution
Arrange the following maxims in the sequence a primary-school teacher should follow when introducing decimal fractions:
(i) Concrete to abstract
(ii) Known to unknown
(iii) Simple to complex
(iv) Particular to general
View solution
Glaser's Basic Teaching Model (1962) places which component immediately after instructional objectives?
View solution
Flanders' Interaction Analysis Category System (FIACS) classifies classroom verbal interaction into how many categories?
View solution
In the three-variable analysis of teaching, the intervening variable refers to:
View solution
The widely-cited definition of Understanding-level teaching given in the book Learning Theory for Teachers (1964) is by:
View solution
2.12 Quick Recall
- Teaching definition (B.O. Smith): “system of actions intended to produce learning”.
- Aim → Goal → Objective — broadest to narrowest.
- Bloom revised (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001): Remember → Understand → Apply → Analyse → Evaluate → Create. (Original 1956 ended Synthesis → Evaluation.)
- Mager (1962): Behaviour + Condition + Criterion; A-B-C-D = Audience, Behaviour, Condition, Degree.
- 5 modes: Teaching, Training, Instruction, Conditioning, Indoctrination.
- 3 levels & proponents: Memory → Herbart (5 steps P-P-A-G-A); Understanding → Morrison (defn. by Bigge; 5 steps E-P-A-O-R → Mastery); Reflective → Hunt (also Bigge & Hunt) → critical thinking, insight.
- Jackson’s phases (1962, Life in Classrooms): Pre-active → Interactive → Post-active.
- Glaser (1962): 4 components — Objectives → Entering Behaviour → Procedures → Assessment (with feedback loop). Feedback is a LOOP, not a 5th component.
- Flanders FIACS (1955–60, U. Minnesota): 10 categories — 7 teacher (4 indirect + 3 direct) + 2 student (response + initiation) + 1 silence.
- Joyce & Weil (1972): 4 families — Information-processing, Social, Personal, Behavioural.
- 3 variables of teaching: Independent (teacher) · Dependent (student) · Intervening (content/method/environment).
- 12 maxims: Known→Unknown, Simple→Complex, Concrete→Abstract, Particular→General, Analysis→Synthesis, Empirical→Rational, Induction→Deduction, Whole→Part, Psychological→Logical, Definite→Indefinite, Actual→Representative, Near→Far.